raylloyd7
United Kingdom |
Posted: Friday, May 27, 2022 @ 2:49:33 AM at |
IP Logged |
|
Just revisited this one and I ramped up the settings I already play advanced 3 click, but as I said a couple of years ago I thought it was a little to bland and open, boy was I wrong lol, I set advanced, gusty, very dry greens difficult pins etc and loved it so much more now. My Apologies for my negative earlier comments, many thanks Willie if you are still around.
|
raylloyd7
United Kingdom |
Posted: Monday, March 2, 2020 @ 7:41:52 AM at |
IP Logged |
|
little to bland and open for my tastes but many thanks for sharing its still a fun course not being unkind at all i wish i had a fraction of the talent of all you designers .
|
willie6860
United States of America |
Posted: Sunday, June 15, 2008 @ 2:36:03 PM at |
IP Logged |
|
This course is set to wish all FATHERS Happy Fathers Day
|
jimi
Netherlands |
Posted: Sunday, June 15, 2008 @ 7:55:57 AM at |
IP Logged |
|
Been a while since Ive played one of your courses Willie, and i must say theres definite improvement. The course looks a lot smoother than what Id seen earlier. It played pretty smoothly also, although i did experience some lag in places. That may be as texture issue. Manmy custom textures do cause lag. Although Im not a particularly good player myself, I suspect the top cyber golfers wont have many problems with this course. That is a polite way of saying that I thought it was a bit boring and repetitive. The main cause of that was the minimal landscaping. All in all the course looked pretty flat, which is not unrealistic in itself, but youd always expect some bumps and depressions in the terrain. A case in point are the things floating the pond around the 7th. What are they? Islands? Theyd be quite soggy, being at the same level as the water. Im a great fan of fantasy elements, but they should be physically realistic. Why not just raise these by a foot or so? Another issue is the pano. This is one of the most beautiful and unfortunately one of the most unusable panos in our collection. The scale is just totally wrong. The buildings are way too big, compared to whats on the course. A shame, really, because it is very pretty. Your planting has definitely improved. The trees looked a lot better than what I recall from your earlier courses, with more variation, both in species and in height. All in all a commendable effort, but hardly worth 4 stars yet. Keep it up tho. Youll get there.
|